Source: This article was published thebusinesstactics.com By Carl Sanford - Contributed by Member: Bridget Miller

The Global Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Market report is organized by executing a phenomenal research process to collect key information of the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management industry. The Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management research study is based on two parts, especially, the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management primary research and outstanding secondary research. Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market secondary research provides a dynamic Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market review and classification of the worldwide Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market. It also lamps on leading players in the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market. Likewise, the primary Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management research highlights the major region/countries, transportation channel, and the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management product category.

The Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market report focuses on major market vendors and various manufacturers persuading the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market. It also includes Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management vital financials, SWOT study, technologies advancement, Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management improvement processes, and so on. The Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market report guide the user by offering a detailed study of the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market. Additionally, the main Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management product categories such as platform, service, cloud deployment, solution, application, and region analysis are covered in the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management report.

The Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market report includes an in-depth analysis of key Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market players. It also includes a review of various supporter along with Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management manufacture study, market size, share, current and forecast trends, sales(volume), supply, Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management production, and CAGR (%). The global Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market research report assists the user to propel their Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management business by providing them detailed market insights. It guides them in planning strategies to explore their Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management businesses.

To Get Sample Copy of Report visit @ https://marketresearch.biz/report/internet-of-things-iot-fleet-management-market/request-sample

The major Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market players are:

  • Oracle Corporation
  • Cisco Systems, Inc. 
  • IBM Corporation 
  • AT&T, Inc. 
  • Intel Corporation 
  • Verizon Communications, Inc. 
  • TomTom International BV 
  • Trimble Inc. 
  • Sierra Wireless 
  • Omnitracs, LLC

An extensive research report of the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market features crucial growth opportunities in the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market that will assist the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management user to plan the business strategy for their future expansions in the worldwide Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market in a specific region. All the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management statistical information and other information are comprehensively crafted to helps the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management user to explore their business wisely.

An in-depth Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market research report focused the growth opportunities in the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market that helps the user to plan upcoming development and progress in the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market in a projected area. All the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market insights, stats, and other information are skillfully organized and represented as per the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management user demand. We also provide the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management customized reports as per the user requirement.

Global Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Report mainly includes the following:

  1. Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Industry Outlook
  2. Region and Country Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Market Analysis
  3. Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Technical Information and Manufacturing Industry Study
  4. Region-wise Production Analysis And the Various Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Segmentation Study
  5. Manufacturing Process of an Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management and Cost Structure
  6. Productions, Supply-Demand, Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Sales, Current Status and Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Market Forecast
  7. Key Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Succeedings Factor and Industry Share Overview
  8. Research Methodology

Have Query? Enquire Here @ https://marketresearch.biz/report/internet-of-things-iot-fleet-management-market/#inquiry

The Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market research report highlights on offering data such as Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market share, growth ratio, cost, revenue(USD$), Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management industry utilization, and import-export insights of Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market globally. This Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management report also studied remarkable company profiles, their suppliers, distributors, investors and Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management marketing channel. Finally, Global Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management Market 2018 report solve the queries and gives the answers of the fundamental questions (What will be the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market size and growth rate in 2026?, What are the Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management market driving factors?) which will be beneficial for your Internet of Things (IoT) Fleet Management business to grow over the globe.

Categorized in Internet of Things

 Source: This article was published themarketingagents.com By Rich Brooks - Contributed by Member: Robert Hensonw

A keyword analysis (or keyword research) is the art and science of uncovering which keyword phrases your prospects are likely to use at Google or other search engines. 

Why is this important?

Because search engines are looking to return relevant results when someone performs a search. The closer the words on your web page, blog post or online video are to the search that was just performed, the more likely you are to rank higher for that search. 

Higher rankings mean more qualified traffic. In fact, a recent study showed that the number one result averaged a 36.4% click-through rate (CTR.) The second place result only managed 12.1% CTR, and the CTR declined with every subsequent result. 

Although using the right keywords isn’t the only reason why your page ranks well or poorly–the quality and quantity of inbound links is important, too–it’s one of the easiest variables for you to affect.

How do you perform a keyword analysis?

Keyword research is a three-step process:

  1. Brainstorm: Whether by yourself, with team members, or trusted customers and clients, you should start by brainstorming a list of your best keywords. These would be the words you think your ideal customer would use when searching for a product or service like yours, or phrases you’d like to rank well for. Anything from “Boston tax accountant” to “how do I write off a business expense?” I talk about using five perspectives to generate the best keyword phrases.
  2. Test: After you generate your keywords, you’ll want to determine if they actually will bring you enough traffic. Often, we’ve been in our industry for so long we use jargon that our prospects don’t use. Or, we are missing out on new, related phrases that could attract new customers. Using a tool like Google Adwords Keyword Tool will help you determine which words and phrases are most likely to attract the most qualified traffic. By entering your phrases into this free online tool, you can discover how much competition you would have from other sites to rank well for a phrase, as well as how many people are actually searching for that phrase. In addition, GAKT will provide a lot of related phrases that may perform better than your original list.
  3. Rewrite: Once you have your list of your best keywords, get to work putting them in strategic places on each page of your site, including the page title, any headers or subheaders, early and often in the body copy, as well as in the intrasite links from one page to another.

How do you know if it’s working?

Improved search engine visibility rarely happens overnight. Continually adding new, keyword rich content to your blog or website over time will improve your search engine ranking and attract more qualified traffic to your site. 

Two reports in Google Analytics can help determine if this is happening. The first can be found at Traffic Sources > Search Engine Optimization > Queries. This report shows your site’s average ranking for any keyword that “resulted in impressions, clicks, and click-throughs.” You can see if you’re moving up or down over time.

 The second report can be found at Traffic Sources > Search Engine Optimization > Landing Pages. This will show you how your individual pages are fairing from a search engine standpoint. 

Finally, take a look at your overall search traffic and the number of leads you’re generating from your website. If the number of leads you’re getting a month is increasing, your work is making a difference.

Categorized in Online Research

In a blog post titled, Toward a More Intelligent Search: Bing Multi-Perspective Answers, Bing announced they are now incorporating a technology often referred to as sentiment analysis into their version of what Google calls Featured Snippets.

Sentiment Analysis is the ability to understand whether the content has a negative or positive sentiment. The implications of how this may affect SEO are far-ranging, especially if Google rolls out their version of it.

A criticism Google’s often received is that their featured snippets are sometimes biased by the question asked. Danny Sullivan recently addressed this shortcoming in Google’s featured snippets:

“…people who search for “are reptiles good pets” should get the same featured snippet as “are reptiles bad pets” since they are seeking the same information: how do reptiles rate as pets? However, the featured snippets we serve contradict each other.

This happens because sometimes our systems favor content that’s strongly aligned with what was asked.”

Engineers at Bing were asking similar questions and doing something about it. According to Bing’s announcement:

“There are many questions that don’t have just one answer, but multiple valid perspectives on a given topic. Should I repeat my search with the word “bad” or “good” in it every time I wanted to get a comprehensive picture of a topic and hear the other side? How would I even know how and when to do that? Should I assume that this single answer Bing returned for me was the best or the only answer? Is that the most authoritative page to answer my question?

“…we believe that your search engine should inform you when there are different viewpoints to answer a question you have, and it should help you save research time while expanding your knowledge with the rich content available on the Web.”

Google is Exploring How to Add Sentiment Analysis

In Danny Sullivan’s article, A Reintroduction to Featured Snippets, he confirmed that sentiment analysis is on their to-do list.

“We’re exploring solutions to this challenge, including showing multiple responses.

“There are often legitimate diverse perspectives offered by publishers, and we want to provide users visibility and access into those perspectives from multiple sources,” Matthew Gray, the software engineer who leads the featured snippets team, told me.”

How to Rank for Intelligent Snippets?

Bing offers clues about what signals they are looking for in sites they rank for intelligent snippets. Here are some of the attributes of the sites they rank:

  1. Authoritative and high quality
  2. Relevant to the topic
  3. Content is easy to crawl and index
  4. Good user experience on the web page

Here are the clues Bing’s announcement disclosed:

“…we prioritize reputable content from authoritative, high quality websites that are relevant to the subject in question, have easily discoverable content and minimal to no distractions on the site.”

The way it works is when you issue a question:

1. Their Web Search and Question Answering engine select candidates from web pages.

2. They organize the candidates in clusters to determine similarity and sentiment

3. Bing ranks the most relevant passages from the web pages from each sentiment based cluster

Limited to the United States

These results are currently limited to a few. However, Bing will be rolling out more results in the near future. These kinds of results are also coming to the United Kingdom soon as well.

“This is just the beginning. We will expand this functionality to address many more questions you have, increase coverage, and expand beyond the US, starting with the United Kingdom in the next few months.”

How Will This Affect SEO?

Sentiment analysis can play a role in helping search engines understand if a review is negative or positive. So if someone links to a web page with a negative sentiment (as in a negative review), then the search engine will know this is negative and may decide not to count the link or to count it as a negative vote.  This may be especially useful for local SEO but it can conceivably creep into regular search as well.

The fact that Bing has confirmed they are using sentiment analysis is big news. That Google has announced their intentions to add it to featured snippets is very important. The big question, of course, is if this kind of technology will be used in other areas of search.

Source: This article was published searchenginejournal.com By Roger Montti

Categorized in Search Engine

The so-called Islamic State (IS) is the most innovative terrorist group the world has seen. In the backdrop of its loss on the ground, IS is expanding its cyber capabilities to conduct more cyber-attacks and hacking. This and its migration into the ‘darknet’ will make IS more dangerous than before.

Terrorist and non-state actors have used different modes and mediums to spread their message and communicate with their comrades. The dawn of the Internet has also provided such groups with unparalleled opportunities to establish communications and operational links that were not possible before. Starting from websites, terrorist groups moved to more interactive mediums like chatrooms and forums. It was social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter that truly revolutionised how militants, terrorists and non-state actors communicated with each other, recruited sympathisers and supporters and disseminated their propaganda.


The self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS) perfected the use of social media, which became the preferred source for the so-called ‘jihadists’ or ‘soldiers of the Caliphate’. In response, tech companies have been compelled to take down Facebook and Twitter accounts affiliated with IS. The unintended cost of this policy is that supporters, sympathisers and members of jihadist groups have moved into the deep web and the darknet.

What is Deep Web and Darknet?

The deep web and darknet are terms that are interchangeably used but they are two different things. The deep web includes all those web pages that a search engine such as Google cannot find. This includes web pages that are password-protected and includes all webmail, private Facebook accounts, user databases and pages behind paywalls. Websites that are not indexed by Google are also considered as part of the deep web. The surface web is all that Google has indexed and a user can access it using any search engine. It is said that the surface web is only the ‘tip of the iceberg’ and the deep web comprises more than 90% of the total Internet, which is almost 500 times of what Google can see.

The darknet is a part of the deep web but there is an important distinction. We access the deep web every day when retrieving our emails, checking bank statements online or logging into Facebook account. However, we cannot enter the dark net through a regular browser. The darknet is accessed using ‘dot onion’ software and not a ‘dot com’ one. As such, dot com browsers such as the Google Chrome and Firefox cannot access ‘onion’ websites. A different browser, the Tor browser, is used for this purpose.

Tor is an onion browser that sends the user through an unusual route to access a web page. For instance, if a user wishes to access a website using Tor, the browser will wrap the request through numerous layers, which will keep bouncing off different domains in different countries. The layers of the onion (hence the name) ensures anonymity and makes it almost impossible to trace the user’s footprints. This makes the Tor browser and dot onion web pages attractive for those wishing to maintain their privacy and secrecy.

IS in the Darknet

Indeed, anonymity does not mean that the darknet is a dangerous place. Individuals, especially journalists, use such avenues to hide themselves from prying eyes of authoritarian states and dictators. Similarly, Tor is used by those who wish to protect their privacy. However, illegal practices can and do happen because of the anonymity that is guaranteed by Tor and the darknet.

The darknet has provided criminals, non-state actors and terrorists tools and avenues that are absent in the surface net. For instance, a webpage by the name of ‘Silk Road’ functioned like the ‘Amazon.com’ for illegal activities, including the sale of drugs, weapons, fake passports and even hitmen. Criminals were comfortable dealing on this platform because of the anonymity in the darknet. The owner/founder of the Silk Road, Ross Ulbricht, was caught by FBI in 2013.


For IS and potential hackers, another attractive market in the dark net is that of hacking tools. IS and its United Cyber Caliphate has conducted several cyber-attacks in the last one year, usually in the form of defacing websites or hacking Twitter and Facebook accounts. The hacking tools and malware toolkits such as Keyloggers and Remote Access Trojans (RAT) are available in the darknet and it is highly probable that cyber terrorists and hackers download them from there.

Keylogger is a computer program that records every keystroke made by a computer user, while RAT is a malware program that enables administrative control over the target computer. As such, both are utilised to steal private and confidential information. Even IS has attempted to distribute such tools amongst its ‘cyber soldiers’. Additionally, IS hackers have also conducted cyberattacks such as the denial-of-service (DoS) attack, where a machine or service is made unavailable.

Islamic State is known for its innovations and ability to adapt to changing environments. When law enforcement agencies started snooping around social media, IS members, supporters and sympathisers migrated to mobile applications such as the WhatsApp and Telegram. The applications have become attractive modes of communication because of their end-to-end encryption, which prevents any ‘peeping’ by intelligence and law enforcement authorities.

Now a pro-IS deep web forum user has recommended that the group’s users migrate to Tor and stop using VPN services, hence ensuring greater anonymity. The distribution of hacking tools also signifies IS’ ambitions to expand its cyber capability. Considering the versatility of the group, this should not take too long.

Policy Implications

The 9/11 attack was the biggest terrorist attack which changed the complexion of global security. The American leadership and public never expected that an attack of this scale in a post-Cold War era could ever happen in the homeland. Yet, it did. Today, the attack that defined Bin Laden’s notorious legacy seems less possible because of all the security measures and precautions that have been taken by countries around the world.

The lack of imagination before was the serious shortfall of security analysts and counter-terrorism specialists who failed to predict or even anticipate 9/11. If IS wants to surpass 9/11, it will conduct a cyber-9/11. This is not an impossible task considering the lax cybersecurity measures. The recent hacks of the Democratic National Committee emails and leaks to Wikileaks signify the vulnerability of private information. The DoS attacks by hacking groups such as Anonymous further underline the capacity of non-state actors to inflict damage.

Indeed, IS does not possess the capacity and capability to attack infrastructure as was the case with Stuxnet. However, even stealing information, hacking and denial-of-service attacks have serious implications. Furthermore, the loss in Syria and Iraq and the narrow space available to the group make a ‘cyber caliphate’ with hacking capabilities the most viable option and dangerous force.

A terrorist organisation that is anonymous and possesses an army of hackers is already becoming a reality. The world is increasingly becoming more connected via the Internet with government and private infrastructure heavily dependent on cyber technology. This is why, with or without IS, the next wave of terrorism is most likely to be ‘cyber terrorism’. Rather than reacting to an attack in the future, the international community must pre-empt this threat now and take necessary steps.

*Shahzeb Ali Rathore is a Research Analyst with the International Centre for Political Violence & Terrorism Research (ICPVTR), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Source : eurasiareview.com

Categorized in Deep Web

When conducting a Hazard Analysis to comply with the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)’s new rules, many are relying on Google to search for scientific studies, guidance and other useful information. But Google, like any tool, is only as helpful as one knows how to use it. Most fail to Google Search effectively, wasting valuable time weeding through (literally) hundreds of millions of search results with little success.

What Are Google Search Operators?
Google Search Operators are simple punctuation, expressions or a combination of the two that enable you to narrow searches to specific sites [e.g., the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s website], file types and words and phrases (as well as exclude unwanted search words and phrases). Put simply, search operators are like secret code that filter out fluff.


How Do Google Search Operators Work?
Below are a few Google Search Operators I use on a regular basis for FSMA- and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)-related Google searches.

site:[._ _ _]
Typing “site:” followed by a url extension (e.g., .com, .gov, .org) will limit your search to a specific site, like government sites (.gov), nonprofit organizations (.org) and university web pages (.edu). To search the FDA website for recalls involving cashews, for example, type in your search terms then add the FDA website extension (.fda.gov):


To search the California Department of Public Health’s website, just add the agency’s url extension (.ca.gov):


“[search term]”
Google Search generates search results based on what it thinks you’re looking for. Typing quotation marks around search terms will limit your search only to the exact word(s) or phrase(s) you entered.

-[search term]

Typing a negative (-) sign before a search term will exclude that search term from the search results. This operator is extremely useful when pestered by unrelated search results that share a common word or phrase. For example, if you are searching for cashew recalls and keep pulling up recalls involving mixed nuts, you can list the other nuts in your search terms with negative signs.

file:[file format]


Guidance documents and scientific articles are often stored online in PDF format. To only pull up PDFs, follow your search terms with file:pdf. If you prefer to search for word docs, type: file:.doc or file:.docx. With these search operators, you can search any file type.

The search above will yield templates in PDF form exclusively from university sites but U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) also has great HACCP resources. Modify your search teams to search the USDA website by typing:

Google Scholar
Google scholar is Google’s search engine that is specially designed to “help you find relevant work across the world of scholarly research.” While Google Scholar is useful, and I recommend using it, expect a high yield of search results to be highly technical scientific studies with limited practical application to a small business or person without an advanced science degree. Still, I have found useful studies with this search engine. The above search operators work in Google Scholar.

Search operators make Google searches (whether you’re using Google Search or Google Scholar) more efficient and can be used to enhance any FSMA- or HACCP-related query. Search operators weed out hundreds of millions of irrelevant search results, helping you locate what you need quickly and (relatively) painlessly.

Charlie Kalish is managing member of Food Safety Guides, a progressive food safety and quality systems consulting firm that specializes in FSMA compliance, HACCP, third-party audit preparation and food safety and quality plan development. He is also senior director for food safety at UC San Diego Extension and a Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance Lead Instructor for human and animal food.

Author : Charlie Kalish

Source : http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/enewsletter/fsma-tip-locate-hazard-analysis-resources-fast-with-google-search-operators/

Categorized in Search Engine

Development of the net with regards to its services and functions as well as its reputation in the world today is often about the maximize with any passing day. The greater area of the world’s society is determined by the net since their important supply of facts. The online world has start new prospects especially in the section of exploration and knowledge and thru helping to make gain access to of data easier, time preserving and offered.typing essay Many web research interfaces are actually acquire to offer end users together with the spanning level or program to get information of the attention. These enginesare specially designed to help in choosing content on the internet, which suits a given criterion. The most common engines like google on the web incorporate google, Bing lookup and yahoo.


Yahoo and google is currently the most famous google search these days. It rose to prominence in 2001 and designed with characteristics that differentiated it using their company search engines like yahoo lifestyle out there. The success of Google and yahoo is dependent on the technique of the excitement on the web page link and also the PageRank, which makes searches much easier with google and yahoo. Great and attractive pages and posts connect with other web pages that refer to them where by other web sites and pages web page link to a particular webpage. This aids the major search engines to provide success based on the site url to other webpages. On the other hand, the interface because of popularity was copied by other businesses and therefore website crawlers adopted to locate neighborhoods in which the an algorithm criteria is used to look for and comply with hyperlinks to look for other webpages which backlink to the first.. How big the crawl provides the best results available with the ceaseless creeping and indexing to supply new success. Additionally, consumers have reassurance of good quality and significance of success, which ranking for many different queries.

Bing is owned by the Microsoft Firm and features its own differentiated options, which can make it tastes around other search engine listings. The aesthetic driven home-page of the major search engines makes all the surfing around expertise intriquing, notable and the information and research supplied within the website supply appealing information to your people. The page is much like desktop computer background, which interests individuals to preserve the website page being a home page. The place of linked searches is really a attribute that assists for making lookups effortless. The advances look for attribute will allow the use filtration system success to obtain the most relevant effects as well as the recently available lookups outlined beneath the hunt nightclub. Bing for that reason capitalizes on enhancing the people practical experience for the duration of exploring.

Yahoo is one other online search engine, which happens to be currently experiencing troubles with the market reveal. Its global recognition appear to be taking a downwards tendency and its at present operated by Bing. However, there are particular features of the major search engines, which proceed making it preferred and discern it from other individuals for example search engines and Bing. It offers compensated and organic and natural outcomes, which can be far more famous in comparison with other success given by other search engines like google. Even more, the attribute, which supplies far more alternatives with regards to looking help the people working experience in regards to seeking. It will allow internet browsers to find with domain and uncomplicated hunt of file styles. Once more, the photo look for aspect allows end users to filtration final results and check in line with the authorization form for the people searching for pictures just for utilize in a website.

In the debate, each one search results seems to be going when it comes to assuring their users provide an knowledge which is additional built-in, which merges look for and sociable jointly. The two small, and significant search engines like yahoo are based around ensuring they remain already in the market and raising their market reveal. For this reason, these are regularly wanting to better their characteristics allowing the doing of employment simpler and giving finest final results achievable.

Source : http://woonoptimaal.nl/kennisbank/analysis-paper-important-research-of-well-known-2

Categorized in Online Research

SANDY — 2016 has provided an interesting election cycle to say the least, and an online study by a Utah-based digital marketing agency shows exactly how interesting it is online.

Oozle Media, which is based in Sandy, searches trends online for clients. In coming up with a political-themed project with just weeks until the general election, the company decided to analyze how search engine company Google autocompleted search resultsfor the top-two candidates.

“It’s a pretty interesting way to get an insight into what the general populous thinks (of) a subject by what they search in Google,” said David Smith, Oozle chief operating officer. “I think this is a real unvarnished view on what people are comparing these (candidates) to. Most of it I think is done in jest, but I don’t think you would have seen this same sort of intensity and volume with the previous election.”


While a couple of results are outlandish, a characteristic was noticed among the results between Trump and Clinton: there’s plenty of negativity toward the Republican and Democratic candidates.

“There’s been unprecedented negativity in this campaign and both of the (Republican and Democratic) candidates are disliked by a majority of their party, so you see that come through in the search results,” Smith said, noting that much of what is searched is based on what people see and hear and type into Google to research further.

So what are the crazier results? Clinton is referred to a Sith Lord from the “Star Wars” movie franchise. Trump got compared to “an angry aimless dictator.” Those are just a few of the results.

Both were compared to villains from the Hunger Games franchise, Oozle team leader Patrik Connole said — but, conversely, both were also referred to as “awesome” and as “bae” in the results showing that the results aren’t all bad.

“(It was) more creative than we thought when got started,” Smith said.

Each search was conducted using an incognito tab to lift bias in Google’s regional results customization, thus giving a larger national result instead of what Utah’s results are.

Smith said Oozle’s future projects don’t bode well for the leading candidates either. The company is finishing a scatterplot based on Google results of “positive to negative and if that inspires confidence or fear.”

“Overwhelmingly for both candidates, it’s in the ‘inspires fear’ and ‘is negative’ quadrant of the scatterplot,” Smith said. “I’d say three-quarters of the search terms are negative and not confidence inspiring.”

The negativity toward the leading candidates has helped third-party candidates, especially in the Beehive State.

On Wednesday, FiveThirtyEight editor-in-chief Nate Silver was a guest on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” and said that Utah’s disdain for either of the major candidates led independent candidate Evan McMullin to his recent surge in the polls.

Independent presidential candidate Evan McMullin, center background, speaks during a rally Friday, Oct. 21, 2016, in Draper, Utah. (Rick Bowmer, AP Photo)

“Like literally nobody ever heard of him until seven days ago,” Silver said on the show. “He moved up from 10 percent to 31 percent in the polls in the span of about a week.”

It’s almost no coincidence, Smith said, that McMullin's recent rise has happened among Google search results in the same way his name has risen in the poll numbers — and it all happened after the leaked “Access Hollywood” video of Donald Trump led to a slew of Utah Republican leaders revoking their endorsement of the candidate.


“(McMullin’s) poll numbers track almost exactly with the number of searches that are happening,” Smith said. “That’s all happened after the Donald Trump video got released.”

Source : ksl

Categorized in Internet Search

Federal regulators just suffered a major setback in their efforts to help cities build Internet services that compete with large providers such as Comcast and Time Warner Cable.

In a federal court decision Wednesday, the Federal Communications Commission was told that it doesn't have the power to block state laws that critics say hinder the spread of cheap, publicly run broadband service.

The ruling marks a significant defeat for a federal agency that for the past several years has turned "competition" into an almost-literal mantra, with its chairman, Tom Wheeler, repeating the word at almost every possible opportunity.

To save the Internet, regulate it

Under the court decision, large Internet providers will continue to enjoy certain benefits that insulate them from the threat of popular city-owned broadband operators such as the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tenn., and the city of Wilson, N.C.

Through EPB, residents of Chattanooga have access to download speeds of 1 Gbps at rates of about $70 a month. People outside of EBP's service area have "repeatedly requested expansions" from the public utility, according to Wednesday's ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, but due to a geographic restriction put in place by the Tennessee state legislature, EPB is prohibited by law from reaching more customers.

Last year, EPB and other so-called municipal broadband providers asked the FCC to intervene on their behalf, and the agency agreed. Invoking a part of its congressional charter that it said would allow it to act against the states, the FCC tried to neutralize those state laws. The states responded by suing the agency, claiming it had no right to come between the historical relationship between states and the cities lying within their jurisdiction. This week's ruling, then, rolls back the federal government's attempt to intervene.

The U.S. just took one step closer to privatizing a core part of the internet


Wheeler, a Democrat, said Wednesday that the outcome of the case "appears to halt the promise of jobs, investment and opportunity that community broadband has provided in Tennessee and North Carolina. In the end, I believe the Commission's decision to champion municipal efforts highlighted the benefits of competition and the need of communities to take their broadband futures in their own hands."

Wheeler's opponents, including from within his own agency, said the outcome was an obvious one.


"In my statement last year dissenting from the Commission's decision, I warned that the FCC lacked the power to preempt these Tennessee and North Carolina laws, and that doing so would usurp fundamental aspects of state sovereignty," said Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai. "I am pleased that the Sixth Circuit vindicated these concerns."

Berin Szoka, president of the right-leaning think tank TechFreedom, said the issue was "federalism 101."

Chicago's internet speeds lag behind other cities'

"The FCC was unconstitutionally interfering with the division of power between state legislatures and municipalities without a 'clear statement' from Congress authorizing it to do so."

The court ruling represents a turning point for the legal tool the FCC tried to use as a weapon against Internet providers. First deployed in earnest by the FCC as an attempt to justify its net neutrality regulations on Internet providers, Wheeler again invoked Section 706 of the Communications Act to defend his moves against state limits on municipal broadband.



Section 706 calls on the FCC to promote the timely deployment of broadband across the country. The state laws targeting EPB and Wilson, N.C., Wheeler argued, amounted to a legal roadblock to meeting that goal, so preempting those state laws was consistent with Congress' marching orders.

In rebuking Wheeler's FCC, the Sixth Circuit has now effectively put some new constraints on what Section 706 may be invoked to accomplish. That is a significant step: Not long ago, policy analysts were saying that there were so few limits on the relatively vague language of Section 706 that the FCC could in theory use it to justify almost anything Internet-related. In effect, the court took what some analysts viewed as an unbounded grant of legal authority and imposed some bounds on it.

There are signs, however, that municipal broadband proponents were anticipating Wednesday's outcome - and are already moving to adapt. One approach? Focus on improving cities' abilities to lay fiber optic cables that then any Internet provider can lease; so far, only one state, Nebraska, has banned this so-called "dark fiber" plan, said Christopher Mitchell, who directs the Institute for Local Self-Reliance's Community Broadband Networks Initiative.

"We're pursuing strategies that are harder for the cable and telephone companies to defeat," said Mitchell.

Source : http://www.chicagotribune.com/bluesky/technology/ct-fcc-broadband-competition-20160811-story.html

Categorized in Internet Ethics


Association of Internet Research Specialists is the world's leading community for the Internet Research Specialist and provide a Unified Platform that delivers, Education, Training and Certification for Online Research.

Get Exclusive Research Tips in Your Inbox

Receive Great tips via email, enter your email to Subscribe.

Follow Us on Social Media